state higher education institutions vs central HEIs क्या राज्य सरकार के HEIs के साथ भेदभाव हो रहा ??

The problem with our university vision

Instead of taking local conditions and market demands into account, India tries to ape the West

source- edublaze

हमारे विश्वविद्यालय के दृष्टिकोण के साथ समस्या 

स्थानीय परिस्थितियों और बाजार की मांगों को ध्यान में रखने के बजाय, भारत पश्चिम की नकल करने की कोशिश करता है

05/07/2022 

हम चर्चा कब करते हैं यूनिवर्सिटी के बारे में 

It has now become an annual ritual in India to discuss the international rankings of higher education institutions (HEI) only when global ranking systems such as the coveted QS World University Rankings are announced. 

The QS World University Rankings rank HEIs on the following components: 

💐academic reputation (40%),

💐 employer reputation (10%),

💐 faculty student ratio (20%),

💐 citations per faculty (20%),

💐 international faculty ratio (5%) and 

💐international student ratio (5%). 

💐The international research network and employment outcomes were 0% for this edition.

While it is heartening.उत्‍साहवर्धक to see that the number of Indian institutes 

💐among the top 1,000 globally has risen to 27 from 22 last year,

💐 and that the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore, has moved up 31 places to emerge as the highest ranked Indian institute in the 2023 edition, 

Institutes of Eminence (IOE)

💐there is no serious debate on the abysmal performance of Indian universities barring the Institutes of Eminence (IOE). 

IOEs occupy a special place as they are 

💐granted more academic and administrative autonomy, 

💐and public IOEs get additional funding.

💐 Therefore, their dominance in the top 500 in the QS World University Rankings comes as no surprise.

Step-motherly treatment

Among the other HEIs too, there is great inequality.

1 As per the All-India Survey on Higher Education (2019-20), 

💐184 of the 1,043 HEIs in the country are centrally funded institutions.

2 The Indian government generously उदारतापूर्वक allocates financial resources to these institutions.

3  However, the financial support provided by State governments to State HEIs

💐is far from adequate.

💐 even though the number of under-graduate students is largest in State public universities (13,97,527) 

💐followed by State open universities (9,22,944) of the total students’ enrollment.

 State-sponsored HEIs barely manage to pay salaries and pensions.

While the number of universities increased 

💐by almost 30.5% in 2019-20 compared to 2015-16, 

academic and administrative infrastructure 

has not been strengthened commensurate to this growth. 

The lackadaisical. उदासीन attitude we see in filling up faculty positions 

💐has further worsened the quality of teaching and 

💐research in HEIs. 

शैक्षणिक और व्यावसायिक विकास प्राप्त करने के लिए कभी भी वित्तीय और अन्य संसाधन नहीं 

💐In fact, quality education and the world class research output that policymakers expect from State public universities.

💐 remain elusive as

💐 these HEIs have never had financial and 

other resources to attain academic and professional growth.

केंद्र वाला अच्छा करेगा या स्टेट वाली संस्था अच्छा करेगी ?

1 On the other hand, the institutions that are generously funded by the Centre perform better

 than their State-sponsored counterparts

 on all academic performance indicators —

💐 faculty strength, 

💐modernised laboratories, 

💐building infrastructure,

💐 digitised libraries,

💐 sponsored research project grants,

💐 computing facilities, etc.

 Therefore, that the State-funded HEIs would not perform

well in these rankings was a forgone conclusion. 

It is a consequence of the unequal and unfair system in the Indian higher education system, 

💐where State-sponsored HEIs are provided step-motherly treatment and 

💐positioned poorly vis-à-vis centrally funded institutions.

कोई भी रैंकिंग प्रणाली 

संस्थानों को उनकी प्रशासनिक चुनौतियों, ढांचागत बाधाओं और वित्तीय कठिनाइयों की जांच करने के बाद तर्कसंगत रूप से रैंक नहीं करती है; वे केवल अकादमिक ताकत और अन्य उपलब्धियों के आधार पर प्रदर्शन मेट्रिक्स पर ध्यान देते हैं

 No ranking system seems to rationally rank institutions after examining their -

🍅 administrative challenges,

🍅 infrastructural constraints and 

🍅financial predicaments;

 they only pay attention to performance metrics based on academic strengths and other achievements.

 For India to perform better on these rankings, we need to pay more attention to the State HEIs.

The NEP vision

1 become multidisciplinary institutions by 2040

The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 has envisaged all HEIs to become multidisciplinary institutions by 2040. 

2 The aim is to increase the Gross Enrolment Ratio in higher education,

💐 including vocational education, from 26.3% in 2018 to 50% by 2035. 

3 हर जिले में  1 होना चाहिए 

💐The NEP also aims to ensure that by 2030,

💐 there is at least one large multidisciplinary HEI in or near every district. 

3 सिंगल स्ट्रीम स्पेशिलिटी संस्था खत्म 

This means that single-stream specialised institutions will eventually be phased out.

4 लेकिन मल्टीडिस्प्लिनरी की रैंकिंग में खुद ही गिरावट आई है 

However, the fact that prominent multidisciplinary universities such as 

💐Jawaharlal Nehru University, 

💐Delhi University, 

💐the University of Hyderabad, 

💐and Jamia Millia Islamia have slipped in the QS World University Rankings.

इस बात को धयान रखिये -

 should compel national think tanks to revisit the NEP’s proposal in this regard.

 A close study of the QS World University Rankings reveals

1 that single-stream specialised HEIs such as the Indian Institutes of Technology and IISc have performed better than their multidisciplinary counterparts. 

2 Eight IITs (Delhi, Bombay, Madras, Kanpur, Kharagpur, Roorkee, Guwahati and Indore) are placed among the top 500 globally, in addition to IISc, Bangalore. 

3 IIT-Indore ranked highest among the second-generation IITs by securing the 396th position and 

4 IIT-BHU made its maiden presence in the 651-700 band.

A plan in the NEP for multidisciplinary education and research universities is also being contemplated 

💐in order to achieve the highest global standards in quality education. 

While everyone is demanding multidisciplinary education नुकसान क्या क्या होगा 

1 the performance of the specialised HEIs in the QS World Rankings bears testimony to their superiority over multidisciplinary/multi-faculty institutions. 

2 The idea of converting a specialised institution into a multi-faculty university does not seem to augur भविष्य well for an economy driven by specialist professionals. 

3 It would be perplexing/ completely baffling; very puzzling./ हैरान करने वाला

 if the IITs decided to offer courses in physical education and medicine or the National Law Universities ran undergraduate degree programmes in mechanical engineering. सोचा कुछ किया और कुछ 

4 It is crucial to emphasise here that nobody is averse to the idea of multidisciplinary/multi-faculty education if there is a 15% to 20% flexibility in the total academic strength. 15 से 20 ℅ की फ्लेसिबिलिटी चलेगी ।

 5 But converting all HEIs into multidisciplinary institutions is not an idea that holds water given the unique conditions and demands in India.

6  No study or data support the idea of transforming specialised institutions into multidisciplinary/multi-faculty universities either.

पश्चिम के देशों में क्या हो रहा ?

 Such an idea may have worked in the West .

In HEIs theinvest substantial resources in multidisciplinary research through private and public research grants and funding. 

But a ‘one size fits all’ approach 

💐may not be of help to India. 

💐The need of the hour is to build and develop our higher education system 

💐while taking into account Indian conditions and market demands.

Source the hindu