While the optics are about ‘party benevolence’, in reality, the state seems to be nudging the poor to fend for themselves
Maharashtra and Jharkhand Assembly elections
cash transfer scheme for women
there was a pattern that was followed — having a cash transfer scheme for women that is at the centre of political campaigning.
‘Mukhyamantri Majhi Ladki Bahin Yojana’
Beginning in August, the National Democratic Alliance government in Maharashtra came up with the ‘Mukhyamantri Majhi Ladki Bahin Yojana’, wherein women who met the criterion would receive ₹1,500 a month in their Aadhaar-linked bank accounts.
‘Jharkhand Mukhyamantri Maiya Samman Yojana’
The Opposition-ruled State of Jharkhand also had the ‘Jharkhand Mukhyamantri Maiya Samman Yojana’, in August, which offered financial assistance of ₹1,000 to eligible women.
Direct cash transfer schemes are no political novelty / new
According to Axis Bank, 14 States already have such schemes in place, covering almost a fifth of India’s adult female population.
So, why is it that across States, cash transfer schemes for women are growing in popularity?
Is this policy learning or are State governments experiencing a fear of missing out?
Are we getting to a point where there is no alternative vision about welfare?
More women in the public-political space
First, presence of women in India’s public-political
pushing parties to cater to their needs. From a mere
- 47% turnout of women in 1962,
- is now 66% in 2024.
- It is the same trend in State Assembly elections.
women constituency’
Along with the increase in turnout, the fact that women are increasingly casting their votes independently reinforces the narrative of a ‘women constituency’.
Women's reservation bill
The hurried manner in which Parliament passed the women’s reservation Bill and the renewed focus on ‘Nari Shakti’
are testimony to the rising pressure on political parties to acknowledge the change. .
Bypassing the middleman
Second, Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT)
. Direct cash transfers to bank accounts have their advantages from the point of view of the state.
It helps the state bypass existing structures of middlemen who pose a hurdle in making these benefits available.
Systemic corruption of this kind is ubiquitous in the Indian setting, and the state lacks the capacity to keep it in check.
With the advent of DBT, States can now transfer money directly to the beneficiary’s account and reduce leakage through the system.
. Yamini Aiyar and Neelanjan Sircar call this “techno-patrimonial”, whereby technology aids in advancing personal loyalty to the leader.
The third reason is an extension of the preceding / past argument.
Cash transfers are an easy way to establish the narrative that the government in power is serious about its commitment to the electorate.
For instance,
- improving the functioning of State-run schools or
- hospitals or
- building new public infrastructure cannot happen overnight.
In addition, given the fact that the poor in India form a significant constituency and that the gains of economic growth are disproportionately divided, populist schemes of this nature are valued by a substantial number of voters.
Regular credit to the beneficiary’s account also acts as a constant reminder of the ‘benevolence / भलाई ’ of the leader, further advancing the party’s position.
The core issue
Fourth, this also points to a larger problem dotting the welfare landscape in India
A flattening of welfare, with States across the country coming up with similar kinds of schemes, indicates a deficiency of imagination vis-à-vis welfare in India.
even States ruled by Opposition parties
are not offering alternatives to this welfare strategy of DBT — sharpened to perfection by the Bharatiya Janata Party at the central level — is worrying.
quick and effective solution to the poverty crisis
Though schemes of this kind might look to be a quick and effective solution to the poverty crisis, DBT comes with its own set of problems.
Scholars have pointed out that the Indian state, by prioritising ‘efficiency’ using technology, is shielding itself from doing the hard work to improve state capacity.
By making cash available in the hands of the poor, the state is nudging its citizens to make use of private alternatives for their basic needs.
While the rich in India have already exited this system and are relying on the private for their needs, the poor are also being nudged by the state to fend for themselves.
But can the poor in India afford to disengage with the state? Cash transfers, at best, act as bandages, but the state still needs to treat the larger wounds before they become infectious — if they have not already become one.
In the days ahead, yojanas such as ‘Ladki Bahin’ and ‘Maiyan Samman’ will occupy centrestage. So, is this the new rule of the game? Or will there be a break to this pattern? The answers will determine the future welfare landscape.
Source the hindu
Comments
Post a Comment