China-Taiwan conflict

China-Taiwan conflict

India needs to enact tougher policies to serve its own interests


China claims Taiwan as its own

and is feverishly preparing to seize the island by force if necessary, while the U.S. has increasinglyclearly signaled that it would probably fight to defend Taiwan.

 India is highly unlikely to fight in a conflict over Taiwan. 

It has vital economic and security interests, and valuable policy levers, to ensure that such a conflict never happens.


Maintain the status quo

New Delhi has three main reasons to do so

1  India and Taiwan have expanded trade seven-fold since 2001 and are exploring a possible free trade agreement. 

The Taiwanese firm, Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation, has partnered with the Tata Group to build India’s first semiconductor fabrication plant. 

An agreement was signed recently to send Indian workers to Taiwan.

 India’s industry, critical supply chains, and overseas population are all increasingly invested in an enduring peaceful status quo across the Taiwan Strait.


Second, any Chinese aggression against Taiwan would be catastrophically costly for India.

ЁЯНБ Such a scenario would, in effect, cripple global trade with China and Taiwan, which would create disruptions throughout Asia and West Asia.

ЁЯНБ A recent Bloomberg study estimates that the costs of a conflict would amount to over 10% of global GDP. 

ЁЯНБIndia’s economy would suffer a greater shock than the U.S. economy and its most valuable sectors, from electronics to pharmaceuticals, would run dry of components and materials.

ЁЯНБA protracted or general war between China and the U.S., spreading beyond Taiwan, could spill over in multiple directions. 

It could ignite the already tense India-China land border. 


. And it could raise the risk of unthinkable nuclear escalation. 

A conflict over Taiwan is something that India simply cannot afford, especially as it seeks stability and growth for national development.


, its outcomes could further worsen India’s long-term international position, . 

ЁЯНБA limited conflict, where China has relative advantages of concentrating force near Taiwan, is also the most likely scenario to end in a Chinese victory over Taiwan and a corresponding defeat of the U.S. and its allies. 

ЁЯНБIf China, through the crucible of battle, thereby displaces the U.S. as the region’s pre-eminent military power, it would undermine the region’s entire security architecture. 

ЁЯНБAmerican security guarantees would be less credible, neighbours may seek to assure their security with more arms or offensive postures, and China’s military would be free to further project unchecked influence, including into the Indian Ocean.

ЁЯНБ It may even feel emboldened рдЙрдд्рд╕ाрд╣िрдд to press its claims on Arunachal Pradesh. 

ЁЯНБIndia is not an American ally, but it does depend on the U.S. for its military modernisation and a broadly benign strategic environment.


What India can do

 Beijing’s strategy for Taiwan uses all instruments of national power, from international law to economic and political leverage, aside from military coercion.


India has six types of policy options at its fingertips:

ЁЯНБ international law arguments;
 ЁЯНБbuilding narratives opposed to aggression; 
ЁЯНБcoordinated diplomatic messaging; 
ЁЯНБeconomic de-risking; 
ЁЯНБactive information operations to support the Taiwanese people; 
ЁЯНБand military support to the U.S. forces in the Indian Ocean.

 
These options can also advance India’s grand strategic position, regardless of their impact on the China-Taiwan dispute. 

Enacting these policies would, first and foremost, lend India more leverage in its intensifying strategic competition with China. 

They also offer additional pathways for India to deepen its cooperation with the U.S., thereby accelerating its national rise.

 And they offer a wider agenda for Indian international leadership, especially among countries of the Global South, which otherwise would be passive or at best uncoordinated in deterring Chinese aggression more broadly.

Such policies, therefore, are not a favour to Taiwan or the U.S.

they would be an act of Indian self-interest.

 Depending on the political context, they may invite Chinese retaliation, but no policy is cost-free, and India has recently shown a tough willingness to weather Chinese opprobrium when necessary. 

India’s expanding interests and ambitions suggest the need for different policy settings, and the costs of such policies would be dwarfed by the costs of doing nothing.

Source the hindu 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Karnataka govt. unveils digital grievance portal for gig workers